IPCEI allows supporting large, strategically important research, development, and innovation projects that connect multiple European Union member states, initial industrial deployment, and infrastructure projects of significant European importance. The support is intended for breakthrough and high technological or financial risk projects that a company would not implement to the same extent, scope, or schedule without public funding. IPCEI is not a single permanent call for proposals, but rather a framework under which national expressions of interest and calls for proposals are organized in specific strategic technology fields.
| Agency | EIS |
|---|---|
| Region | EU |
| Country | EE |
| Legal form | Company |
| Max funding | There is no general maximum grant amount per company or project., The maximum possible aid is the lower of two values: the project's discounted funding gap or the total sum of eligible costs of the project., Approval from the European Commission does not oblige the Estonian state to pay out the entire permitted amount. The actual grant depends on the national budget, the funding decision, and the ceiling approved by the Commission. |
| Coverage | State aid may cover up to 100% of the justified funding gap, but not more than the eligible costs. This does not automatically mean 100% coverage of the project's total costs. The company must make a significant own or private sector contribution to project financing. The share and amount of grant is determined based on funding gap analysis for each company's project. IPCEI support can be combined with European Union funding, such as Innovation Fund, Connecting Europe Facility, or Cohesion Funds, as long as double compensation of the same costs is avoided. |
| Applying via Estonia |
|
|---|---|
| High level of project innovation |
|
| Permitted project types |
|
| Contribution to EU objectives |
|
| Existence of market failure or societal challenge |
|
| Cross-border and integrated cooperation |
|
| Funding gap |
|
| Company co-financing |
|
| Positive spillover effect |
|
| Limits for first industrial deployment |
|
| Environmental requirements |
|
| Impact on competition |
|
| Form of participation |
|
| European Commission approval |
|
| Possible strategic sectors |
|
| Documentation | https://eis.ee/teenused/ipcei/ |
Feasibility studies and preparatory technical studies. |
Costs of obtaining permits necessary for project implementation. |
Costs of equipment, instruments, installations, and vehicles to the extent and during the period they are used in the project. |
If the equipment is not used solely for the project during its entire useful life, the eligible cost is depreciation corresponding to the project period. |
Costs of acquiring or constructing buildings, infrastructure, and land to the extent and during the period they are used for the project. |
Costs of materials, supplies, components, and other products necessary for the project. |
Costs of acquiring, validating, and protecting patents and other intellectual property. |
Costs of contract research, knowledge, patents, and other intangible assets purchased or licensed under market conditions. |
Costs of consultancy and equivalent services used exclusively for the project. |
Direct personnel and administrative costs related to R&D and innovation activities, including justified overheads. |
For infrastructure projects, direct personnel and administrative costs incurred during the construction of the infrastructure. |
Capital and operating expenses for first industrial deployment to the extent and during the period they are related to the FID stage and include a significant R&D or innovation component. |
Other justified costs directly necessary to achieve the project's objectives and whose eligibility is confirmed by the national authority and the European Commission. |
Innovativeness of the project and technological breakthrough compared to the sector's existing level. |
Quantitative or qualitative importance of the project, including its size, scope, and levels of technological and financial risk. |
Contribution to EU strategies, competitiveness, sustainable economic growth, and solving societal challenges. |
Existence of significant or systemic market failure, coordination problems, or societal challenge. |
Project’s suitability with the specific IPCEI focus, value chain, and common objectives. |
Substance of cross-border cooperation and the project's complementarity with the projects of other direct participants. |
Extent, specificity, measurability, and binding nature of positive spillover effects. |
Credibility of technical feasibility, work plan, schedule, milestones, and team. |
Realism and evidence of the funding gap calculation, and its consistency with the company’s business plan and financial forecasts. |
Necessity, proportionality, cost-effectiveness, and leverage of private sector funding for the aid requested. |
The company’s ability to provide significant co-financing and implement the project in its full planned scope. |
Project’s compliance with the DNSH principle and EU environment, climate, and other regulatory requirements. |
Possible impact of the aid on competition and the internal market, and planned measures to avoid undue distortion of competition. |
For infrastructure projects, the European significance of the infrastructure and ensuring open and non-discriminatory access. |
Ordinary business activity or regular expansion of existing production capacity. |
Minor updating of an existing product, service, or technology, or development of a routine new version. |
Mass production, ordinary commercial production, sales, or marketing activities. |
A project whose benefit is limited only to the applicant, its group, or direct clients. |
A project that only solves an internal funding or business problem and does not address a significant market failure or societal challenge. |
Independent project with no substantive connection to other IPCEI participants and the European value chain. |
A project lacking sufficient cross-border cooperation or credible positive spillover effects. |
A project that would be carried out in the same extent, scope, and timetable without support and therefore lacks a funding gap. |
Costs not directly related to the project or incurred outside the eligible R&D, innovation, infrastructure, or FID period. |
First industrial deployment costs that lack a significant and necessary R&D or innovation component. |
Project that causes significant harm to environmental objectives or does not comply with the DNSH principle. |
Aid that exceeds the proven funding gap or sum of eligible costs. |
Associated and indirect partners cannot receive support for their project under IPCEI state aid rules. |
Regular substantive and financial reports on project implementation must be submitted according to the national funding decision. |
The European Commission may require ex-post evaluation of the project. |
Direct participants are usually included in the IPCEI management structure and must provide information about project progress, milestones, cooperation, and spillover effects. |
Depending on the IPCEI management model, associated partners may be required to undergo evaluation and annual reporting. |
Indirect partners generally do not have to submit annual IPCEI-level reports, but the national authority may require separate reporting from them. |
The beneficiary must prove fulfillment of obligations regarding knowledge dissemination, cooperation, licensing, and other spillover effects. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General data about the company and group, ownership structure, and project management team. |
Technical description of the project, objectives, work packages, schedule, milestones, and measurable performance indicators. |
Description of project innovativeness and comparison with the existing technological level of the sector. |
Explanation of the project's contribution to the specific IPCEI and EU strategic objectives. |
Description of market failure, systemic problem, or societal challenge. |
Description of the project’s connections to projects of other European participants and the planned cross-border cooperation. |
Project-based business plan and financial model. |
Funding gap calculation using the European Commission’s valid IPCEI form. |
Financial forecasts for the entire economic life of the project, including subsequent commercial or mass production stages. |
A realistic counterfactual scenario describing implementation without state aid. |
Quotations, market data, internal decisions, independent studies, or other verifiable documentation supporting the assumptions of the funding gap calculation. |
Detailed budget of eligible costs, distinguishing between R&D and first industrial deployment costs. |
Requested aid amount and form, as well as the company’s own and private sector funding sources. |
Plan for positive spillover effects with concrete, measurable, and binding commitments. |
Principles of intellectual property, dissemination of results, and, if necessary, FRAND licensing. |
DNSH assessment and other environmental information related to the project. |
Information about previous and planned other public funding to avoid double financing of the same costs. |
Final document forms and annexes are determined in the specific Estonian sectoral expression of interest or call for proposals. |